The theories on the game that were being discussed before mod archived the thread:
Maple Syrup's angle:
The obvious answer would be a large distraction. Subvert movements, subvert collaboration, bog collective consciousness down in any way shape or form. Delay delay delay.
Why would they want to delay?
my guess would have to be until they can roll out the development of AI
I heard a quote that stuck with me which paraphrased is, Humans are the sex organs of the machine world.
Once they have AI in full motion, then they can conquer.
Iker Casillas' reaction: >wake up>check /pol/ for nightly habbenings>click on this>get fucked up>thanks OP
Pavel Nedved joins the party with his theory:
the ((economic)) theory on why they need immigration is a lie for the reasons youve mentioned, the goal is to breed out white people that have historically been a barrier to their direct world control, a race that every so often produces people of high intellect, violence and action. they want overpopulation, forced interbreeding, the destruction of self sufficiency.
the endgame is a 2 tier world where a tiny, immortal breakaway ((elite)) live in castles and benefit from every piece of esoteric advanced tech of the future genetic engineering, advanced AI, advanced weaponry, interdimension technology), surrounded by a globe of chimmp tier low IQ slaves who can never be a threat to them again.
Swiss Army Knife Weighs in:
but than the game changed in the last 20 years. What was the game before the relevance of AI?
I guess the game is also to keep the population as distracted as possible. Never being alone, not able to think clearly, never learn to think philosophical.
Duertete is not going to be quiet:
the most outlandish thing i believe is that we are in a isolation state. we have been told by outside forces that there is a (((problem/deciever/oppostion))) to the human race before we can ascend as the human race