the only reason a company would use battery power is because of authoritarian subsidies
that being said electric driven fans are viable but direct drive weighs less although distributed thrust might make up for it
and batteries are more toxic and centrally produced than biofuel which has 95 percent the energy density of traditioal hydrocarbons and is carbon neutral and can be made with nothing but waste products and microbes or just solar energy via photosynthesis
Stop sucking the cocks the conflict mineral cartel and the authoritarians trying to use carbon credits as a means of control... they are so fucking stupid that some of them even say that biofuels, which are non toxic otherwise fry cooks would have cancer, produce increases in net carbon even though biofuels pull in carbon from the atmosphere in their photosynthetic form, like with algae based biofuel or algae to fermentation based ethanol.
Stop sucking the cocks the conflict mineral cartel.
IS more expensive energy costs going to make it easier for coastal residents to adapt to inevitably rising coastlines??? You think carbon credits are going to deter developing nations from emitting carbon?? You think that even if we stopped right now emitting all carbon that the earth would not still get hotter?
They are trying to pass laws so that you can get thrown in jail for denying climate change:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qN5L2q6hfWo
BIOFUEL ONLY NEEDS CONTAINERS AND MICROBES AND SOLAR ENERGY TO BE PRODUCED. AND IT DOES SO WITHOUT CENTRAL PRODUCTION MODELS OR EVEN MAINTENANCE. ALL YOU NEED IS CLEAR PLASTIC TUBES THAT YOU CAN PUT EVEN ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD TO HARVEST ALGAE. THE ALGAE CAN BE PUMPED SO PROCESSING IS MINIMALLY ENERGY INTENSIVE.