WHY THE FUCK ARE THERE SO MANY GAYASS FUCKING SIZES FOR BIKE PARTS???
>Integrated Headset? Zero Stack? Standard? ,,,,,,,,,,,,,When comes to headset >nomenclature??
For the spacing of rear hubs it couldnt just be 135mm no sir. we had to "innovate" better ways to turn to 142 to 148 when all we had was 126 and 130.
says Shi-Ma-No, you need these plastic adapters to install your new Bottom Bracket
says Krap Tool, we've made these three/eights aloominum tools just for your specific series of japanese bottom brackets, but we've also got them for other "STANDARDS"
How could we have allowed over 69 million "standards",,,,,,,, to be used at the same exact time? Sure proprietary parts on superbikes, yes. How much longer until we abandon 9/16 inch and 1/2 inch pedal threads for metric and have a debate on how it performs over whitworth and vice-versa because of fucking weight gains, RIGIDITY, FEEL, OPTIMIZATION, how good they are for gravel bikes, ad infinitum
people will REFUSE to use ETRTO,,, for the next century we will continue hearing
>oh haha is that like 27.5er 29er 26er 69er 49ers Seahawks
Nevermind trying to sell
> "MTB is now boring, gravel now king"
because it's not like people have raced on dirt or gone overland on 622x28 or 630x35 in the past century
>is this all the doing of the (((bike industry))) or is there some other grand scheme i am missing?
Find that most bicycles use JIS square taper rather than ISO square taper,,,