Threads by latest replies - Page 6

Trump approval increases after telling brown citizens to go back to countries theyre not from

No.430536 ViewReplyOriginalReport
When President Donald Trump was asked by a reporter on Monday whether he was concerned that his tweets attacking four Democratic lawmakers were widely viewed as racist, the president said no because "many people agree with me."

It appears he may have been correct.

A national survey conducted online by Reuters/Ipsos on Monday and Tuesday — following Trump's racist tweets on Sunday — found that his approval rating went up with Republicans.

is net approval with Republicans in the new poll was 72%, an increase of 5 percentage points from a similar poll conducted last week.

On the other hand, Trump's approval dropped with Democrats and independents after his tweets. The poll found that about 30% of independents supported Trump, dropping from roughly 40% last week. Trump's net approval with Democrats dropped by 2 points in the new poll.

The latest online poll surveyed 1,113 adults. The credibility interval, an attempt at measuring precision, was 5 points for both Republicans and Democrats, meaning Trump's approval among Republicans, for example, could in fact be unchanged or even greater than the 5-point change found in the poll.

Trump's approval rating overall was unchanged since last week, with 41% of the US public approving of his performance in office and 55% disapproving.

Trump in his tweets told the lawmakers, who are women of color and US citizens, that they should "go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came." The tweets played off of the racist "go back to Africa" trope.

The president's demeaning tweets have prompted outrage across the US and led to condemnation from world leaders. A resolution condemning Trump's tweets passed in the House on Tuesday with every Democratic member voting in favor of it. Democrats were joined by just four Republican lawmakers in passing the resolution.
27 posts omitted

With no justice for MH17 victims

No.430204 ViewReplyOriginalReport

<- americunt fake propaganda shit

real story behind ->

Immediately after the launch of Flight MH17, local officials and armed insurgents as well as civilian volunteers and OSCE observers rushed to the crash site. The insurgents announced that they would maintain a ceasefire for three days to enable rescue and salvage operations, guaranteeing the safety of every person who participated in it.1

Among those who arrived first were agents who apparently acted on behalf of the government in Kiev. As described in the previous chapter, OSCE observer Michael Bokiurkiw saw men working with tools on the wreck. Many more people were busy with other things than collecting body parts for transport. The frontlines in this civil war were not sharply demarcated. Regional security organizations had not been completely relocated.

For example, when police colonel A.V. Gavriliako, the head of department at the Prosecutor General's Office in Makeevka (northeast of Donetsk), was instructed by the Insurgent Internal Security Service (MVD) to investigate the crash, he wanted to get his approval Superior, Colonel Goncharov, catch up. After he got the O. k. Gawriliako drove with two vehicles to Hrabowe in the early hours of the 18th of July. He was then called again by Goncharov, who now told him that he should return immediately on the orders of Kiev. Since Gawriliako did not even command the convoy, he could not obey and then accepted instructions from the authorities of the "Donetsk People's Republic" (DPR). When he contacted his superiors again the next day, he was told that only the SBU was allowed to conduct investigations - but the secret service left Donetsk in May and did not appear in the crash zone, at least not officially.2
5 posts omitted

Trump policy on “wall” building fails - again.

No.421498 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport

A federal judge on Friday issued a ruling blocking the Trump administration from tapping billions of dollars in military funds to construct a wall on the United States's southern border.

U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam issued the permanent injunction in a California federal court after initially ruling last month to temporarily halt the administration’s use of military funds for the border wall.

President Trump declared a national emergency earlier this year in order to divert roughly $6 billion in Defense Department funds toward border wall construction. Friday's ruling blocks the administration from using $2.5 billion in military funds for a border wall.

The injunction halts border wall construction at different sites in New Mexico, California, Arizona and Texas, expanding Gilliam's previous ruling.

Gilliam, an Obama appointee, made the ruling on the military funds in a lawsuit brought forward by several groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Sierra Club, challenging the diversion of the military funds under the scope of the national emergency order.

The Trump administration had argued that the use of the military funds was lawful under the scope of the national emergency, as the need for the funding was "unforeseen." And the lawyers claimed that if they are unable to award the federal dollars to contractors by the end of the fiscal year, they may lose the funding.

In his ruling Friday, Gilliam wrote that the administration lawyers "present no new evidence or argument for why the court should depart from its prior decision, and it will not."

"Because no new factual or legal arguments persuade the court that its analysis in the preliminary injunction order was wrong, [the groups’] likelihood of success on the merits has ripened into actual success," the ruling reads.
162 posts omitted

Black American Obesity Woman is told by American Airlines to Cover Up or Get the fuck off our plane!

No.430563 ViewReplyOriginalReport
She's a doctor (affirmative action degree) who was visiting her distant slave ancestors; which are now British, in Jamaican Me Crazy Shitty Island. When she was leaving, though not sure why, she boarded American Airlines barely wearing anything to cover up her disgusting fat black ass. A faggot attendant told her to cover up or get the fuck off but in a much politer gay tone.

Moral of the story: Fuck American Airlines, fuck that piece of shit island, but fat people barely wearing clothes should be illegal. It's disgusting. If you want to look sexy and feel sexy, LOSE WEIGHT! Stop feeling sorry for yourself, lazy, scared of gym-pussy intimidation, or just afraid of achieving something your parents failed at.

Also, fuck CNN. Their stories are becoming like Faggot Fox's.

First ever pic of atoms having sex

No.427932 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Scientists have captured the first ever image of a phenomenon which Albert Einstein once described as "spooky action at a distance". The photo shows a strong form of quantum entanglement, where two particles interact and share their physical states for an instant. It occurs no matter how great the distance between the particles is.

The connection is known as Bell entanglement and underpins the field of quantum mechanics. Bell entanglement is now harnessed in practical applications such as quantum computing and cryptography. However, it has never before been captured in a single image.
21 posts omitted

scooter riders get tickets cuz democraps want regulations

No.426322 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Police cracking down on scooter riders amid new regulations
>Under the new rules, dockless device companies are to cap the speed at 8 miles per hour in places like the boardwalk. However, it’s clear some companies haven't fully installed the software with a handful of scooters still go faster than others.
Translation: You can't tell how fast you are going because the company's violated the new regulations by not immediately surrendering property to the state land fill & buying brand new products; thereby, resulting in us getting fined cus we voted for democrats to save us from extremely dangerous technology?

>San Diego police say over the holiday weekend, officers had to issue countless verbal warnings to underage riders and handed out nearly 100 citations for other common violations like speeding or riding two to a scooter.

>All of the violations and warnings took place just about a week after new scooter regulations were set to take effect in the city of San Diego, with a concentration on downtown and beach areas.
26 posts omitted

bianca devins

No.429155 ViewReplyOriginalReport
i’ve been reading a lot on this case and i keep finding she was a regular user on 4chan under the names oxychan, ash and many others but haven’t been able to find anything except for the comments on her death..
did anyone actually talk to her or had heard of her before any of this happened? or where can i find some of her old posts?
29 posts omitted

Pornography? On MY internet? Results from our viewer survey may surprise you

No.429773 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Twenty-two women are suing the adult video production company Girls Do Porn for fraud, coercion, and misrepresentation, after the company spread and sold the videos online—even after it promised the films would likely never reach a wide audience.

According to NBC 7 in San Diego, the lawsuit alleges that Girls Do Porn owners Michael Pratt and Matthew Wolfe, as well as actor and recruiter Andre Garcia, convinced the women—all ages 18 to 22—to agree to be filmed having sex on camera, but without them realizing the videos would be widely distributed and sold on the internet.

According to the lawsuit, Girls Do Porn posted ads to Craigslist that appeared to be for modelling gigs, but when the women responded with interest, the company revealed that the job was actually to shoot porn. They were assured that the videos would only be sold on DVDs to “private collectors” in Australia and New Zealand, according to the plaintiffs, and that no one they knew would ever come across the films.
5 posts omitted