>>460881>At no point does she say in any of the hearings that she remembers nothing
We're not talking about the last fake accusation, we're talking about the current one. There have been no hearings in regards to this accusation. >Kind of like a fantasy world you live in where there was only one accuser?
Only one accuser who also claims to be a direct victim. At least she's not a Clinton defense lawyer!
You are fooling absolutely nobody thinking I was referring to the confirmation-hearing accuser, given like like most other Americans I've already forgotten her name and everything else about her because she was just another unconvincing sideshow.>The only book I could find being published on this matter is published by two NYT reporters and features statements by the accusers but the book is not written by any of the accusers.
Oh that's my bad, I just assumed they since the book they were making statements for was being written for profit that they'd naturally be sharing in that profit. Silly me.>>460893>I admitted my fuck up, can we focus back on your lies now?
That original post my was post, not theirs.
Moreover, you admitting your fuck up would mean admitting the very basis of your world outlook, and your personal and political praxiis are built entirely on abhorrent TV programming. Unfortunately /news/ has neither the character nor the post limit for the amount of confessing you'd need to do.