I'm at the depth that says that we should ban all cars in a 5 years process where 1st world countries don't need cars any more. This can only be done through regulation of the 1%, or their death. >>1664421 is definitely right, but that's where fascism comes in. It's definitely better to be a slave in a society that promises to protect the environment and your traditional values than to be a free man in the hellhole that is today's life, and what will come after. Sadly even I am wrong in this because no one would be willing to do this. The most we can do is create a movement that wants to ban cars at least and return to a non-globalist world. I know tankies and socfags also want this. This would only prolong our extinctiona deadline. Clearly something bigger has to be done. >humans are the cancer of the earth so they need to be exterminated
If that is true, you are the worst cancer ever. The survival of your species is ultimately the greatest goal. Even cancer knows this.>We should use green powersources
Oh? And what do you propose?
Take up too much space and produce too little electricity. Also, completely dependent on the wind strength.
Research what they are made out of, then we talk. Also, they last 16 fucking years, and it takes 10 years for you to produce enough energy that it can cost the same as the price that you paid to have that solar panel built.
Based, but R.I.P. in 2077
If you don't follow a slow 50 year reverse-indistrialization, then enjoy >>1664330