My ips monitor is calibrated with my spyder...
I bet you've got a tn monitor and no calibration. Timestamp both or suck my dick cholo.>>3581124>doesn't know about colour depth>thinks lost colour information due to over aggressive chroma nr can be recovered>thinks false colour caused by xtrans can be corrected in post with gamut control
The only way crop could ever match the snr for ff is by either exposing for twice as long or by opening the aperture by one stop. I.e, you have to compromise your shot if you believe noise will be too much of a detractor, which it always is at 1600 or above on crop.>>3581134>no one cares about equivalency
Sensorlets sure do make a lot of angry noise for poor bois.>>3581139
This was the weakest attempt at a defense I've ever seen, I bet you pay homeless guys so you can jerk them off.>>3581176
The shutter speed would be the same, but the noise would be worse on crop, the dof would be deeper and the shot would have a lower resolution.>>3581269
Of course how you want the final image to look wrt dof has an effect on exposure you fucking moron.>>3581325
Lol, no, you've been told by everyone that f equivalence is a real thing, cuck Lord.>>3581374
The lens quality doesn't change, snr is a measure of how much signal is gathered, what gathers more, a big sensor, or a small one. You fucking dummy.>>3581378
Are you saying the sensor plays no part in the exposure? That's a bold statement pal.>>3581379>you are deciding that aesthetics are important in photo
No shit sherlock>>3581392
You realise all of that is perfectly explained with aperture equivalency, right?>>3581399>2.8 = 2.8
Transmission is a per unit area measurement, you're ignoring that crop has half the unit area.