Last one hit 300
Previous thread >>3270135
All film related discussion
R8 other anons photos
What do you think of this one?

need cars and motorsport thread. i like cars but im bad at photographing them... need inspo! also havent seen one up for ages

Ok /p/. Help me identify this city. I don't know anything about it. I just found the photo on the internet.

My babies: Sony a6000 and A7R II

Last thread: >>3273234

Read the entire sticky first!

Post anything gear related, cameras, lenses, filters, bags, tripods, other accessories (clothing, fancy straps, Leica) etc...
Post your question here, instead of starting a new thread about which lens to buy or what are the best beginner cameras.

And don't forget, be polite!

Scanner thread.

Currently in the mark for a scanner for my 35mm film, wondering if i should shell out and get a plustek or go for something like an epson v600.

What are you experiences with flatbeds for 35mm? How much work do the colours take?

Are the plustek printers worth it? Will I be able to see a difference? Are they easier/harder to use?

Can /p/ manually stack these photos on each other, since my scanner doesn't have enough latitude to do it all at once?

Any advices with the Sony DSC-W830?
So, for the past 5 months or so I have started doing photography as a hobby and only used my cellphone camera.
So I want to buy a camera and this particular model is close to my budget but besides the picture quality probably being higher than my cellphone's I don't know what other aspects could be worth on buying it.

When a manufacturer makes the same lens in different mounts, especially significantly different mounts, how do they maintain the same image (and in turn, reputation)?
A specific example I'm thinking of is the Nippon Kogaku / Nikkor / Nikon 105mm f/2.5. It's available in rangefinder and SLR format. Those two designs require the lens to look and feel radically different. Even if it was as simple as making everything some percent larger for the SLR version, how does it just magically have the same characteristics, positive comments from users, etc? The front element is bigger, the rear element is farther from the sensor/film, etc.
Or am I wrong to make the assumption that because people treat them the same, that they are the same? Might the rangefinder version be a totally different thing than the SLR version? Speaking of the 105 specifically, they even changed the basic design from Sonnar to Gaussian, and it seems like many people don't even realize it although they are noticeably different, so I wouldn't be surprised if there are a lot of behind-the-scenes changes that people don't realize.

Picture straight from smartphone LG V10 (The best Camera is the one you have on you) shot in Biarriz, France