>>3729655Super cool pic, I like it. Maybe the composition could be tweaked to be a little better but the subject matter is interesting which is really what matters most in this type of doc photgraphy.
>>3729587Overall decent. looks too edited and the sky is too saturated though which makes it a bit cheesy. I would also say crop a bit of the bottom part off and the composition would be nicer. I would say this would be worth trying a re-edit though since the structure of the photo is nice.
>>3729561This type of street shot is overdone IMO
>>3729560Not really much of a subject here, get closer to focus on people's faces
>>3729559There's something here, but it's not quite pulled off. Needs something to emphasize the red more. If this was shot with a very saturated film (or simulation) of Kodak Ektar to make the red pop more. Or if you used the camera on a tripod to get motion blur of people around her or something. Or if there was a beam of light casting on her, just something to add more emphasis to the subject. Also I would say get lower and get closer.
>>3729536Would have been better if she were facing the camera. The lighting and colors are quite nice though.
>>3729535I think this should be portrait orientation since the background isn't doing much for this photo
>>3729534I think this is the best of the three. If I were to change something I would shift a bit so the pole isn't lined up straight behind her.
>>3729493Aside from dev issues, it looks cool. This type of shot I would probably have bracketed by aperture. Try a small aperture with long shutter speed and see if the blurred water effect works well. I see some blurring already but if you had more of a distinct subject (like someone sitting on the logs or something) This shallow DOF would work super well. I like the vibe of this shot though.
