/p/ - Photography

1MiB, 1364x764, party3.png

fake it till we make it

Anonymous Thu 18 Apr 2019 03:16:31 No.3466059 View Reply Original Report

https://www.youtube.com/c/DinoSilvestri/live

how can we make it look like these people are really in the studio?

aside from the obvious...having them really in the studio...

link and pic attached.

710KiB, 1037x1565, 000325210007.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 14 Apr 2019 18:44:11 No.3464414 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3465778 >>3466049

who this this cali fuckboi?

>but seriously idk if i like this photo or not

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

2 posts omitted

808 !XjcHGg3YgQ

808 !XjcHGg3YgQ Mon 15 Apr 2019 14:35:03 No.3464822 Report

Quoted By:

>>3464805
I think this was taken in San Francisco on market street. I remember that rail handle and the cable car lane.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 10:25:57 No.3465647 Report

Quoted By:

It looks just like any other snapshit, get the fuck out

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI Wed 17 Apr 2019 17:16:12 No.3465778 Report

Quoted By:

>>3464414
>but seriously idk if i like this photo or not
It's not terrible. I'd crop out about 50% of the frame, though--way too much headroom, nothing on the right, distracting background people on the left, nothing on the bottom.

Also, I'm intrigued by the fact that you have "Cannon" [sic] "AE-1 Program" in the EXIF.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 19:33:24 No.3465848 Report

Quoted By:

Something about it is pleasant- the lighting, colors, depth, mood - but the composition is off, the empty space isn't empty enough (distracting elements such as lighting, people, thing above performer), and the subject is a cliche in photography (at least this image alone).

Pay attention to the whole frame, cut things out that are irrelevant or distract from the focus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Apr 2019 02:54:01 No.3466049 Report

Quoted By:

>>3464414
>fuckboi
>San Francisco

You answered your own question

37KiB, 697x440, images.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Photojournalism

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 14:16:42 No.3465698 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By:

I want to get into photojournalism but I have no idea how you would even start.

I want to go to dangerous areas and conflicts.
I assume you make your own connections with people who will take you places but what do you do from there?

How does one sell/get there images out there? How do you make a living off of it?

28 posts and 2 images omitted

Mirv !!TXM6KhIfKn2

Mirv !!TXM6KhIfKn2 Wed 17 Apr 2019 20:55:48 No.3465918 Report

Quoted By: >>3465987

>>3465884
I'm more a freelancer on riots/demonstrations here

I would say something about 80/100 bucks per act

it depends on the media that bought your pic, bigger the media or the exposure, better the money.

from my photoj mates I see working here, depends on the day. maybe 2k to 3k per month working almost everyday. if you have some dangerous assignment, it would be close to 4k.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 18 Apr 2019 00:06:34 No.3465987 Report

Quoted By: >>3465992 >>3465996

>>3465918
>Working everyday
> 2k or 3k

Wtf.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1553674796263.png, 43KiB, 434x521

Anonymous Thu 18 Apr 2019 00:17:12 No.3465989 Report

Quoted By:

>turning to 4chan for career advice

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20190417-191546_Chrome.jpg, 306KiB, 720x1480

Anonymous Thu 18 Apr 2019 00:21:56 No.3465992 Report

Quoted By: >>3465996

>>3465987

Mirv !!TXM6KhIfKn2

Mirv !!TXM6KhIfKn2 Thu 18 Apr 2019 00:48:49 No.3465996 Report

Quoted By:

>>3465987
this >>3465992 pretty much...

it's kinda depressing tbqh

713KiB, 1500x1000, _P3M0028.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 15 Apr 2019 12:40:36 No.3464744 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3464797

Went to a nearby park in the late afternoon, took some pics but I'm not really happy with them. Besides critique of these specific photos I'd like some pointers/tips/experiences on how to shoot in this particular environment, as I'm having trouble taking a good picture even if I see something interesting/nice. Also, what to do with all these boring-ass grey/green/brown colours?

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

20 posts and 18 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 50-57035--3.jpg, 536KiB, 1400x1100

Anonymous Mon 15 Apr 2019 13:50:31 No.3464797 Report

Quoted By: >>3464917

>>3464744
You're taking shots you shouldn't be. And forest really isn't at its best right now. Especially when the sun is shining. Sparse leaves and sun combine for very high contrasting scenes. Very demanding shooting situations. You normally need some canopies to disperse the light when sun is out. You should be shooting meadows right now. Judging from the undergrowth, It'll take at least few weeks for greens to penetrate forest. Go back when all is green, improve your composition, and get a circ polarizing filter to help with high contrasting scenes, they do wonders with leaves of any kind. Also, go there midday, evening sun isn't very good for shooting in the forests because it's giving even harsher shadows, and ugly sun. It's different when you're shooting at the forest from longer ranges.
Exposure bracketing, fog, mist, rain, snow, panoramas, pathways, everything helps... Focus on details, flowers, leaves, trunk parts, look for cedars and bokehwhore. Closeup and macro in your conditions should work well, though.

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 Apr 2019 19:26:07 No.3464917 Report

Quoted By:

>>3464797
Thanks, all of that makes sense.

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI Wed 17 Apr 2019 17:47:33 No.3465797 Report

Quoted By:

>>3464748
This one's decent.

I think the main problem with the other park pics is that they're just like "here's a tree" which is hard to do in an interesting way. I don't have any really good advice other than just don't take those pictures, which isn't particularly good advice. Maybe just keep trying and see if you can find some way to take a picture of a tree that no one has done a million times before.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 17:57:22 No.3465802 Report

Quoted By:

>>3464757
Aesthetically pleasing picture : good contrast, texture, well balanced composition. Only flaw : boring subject, but it doesn't matter.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 19:45:19 No.3465852 Report

Quoted By:

When it comes to shooting specific objects in nature, lighting is one thing but so is the subject.

Considering that fallen trees, dead trees, rocks, streams, litter, etc., are actually normal occurrences (for better or worse), there's a need to actually take a step back from taking a photo and reflect on the subject's significance, if it's one of the above. Look at your surroundings or consider the location and think about whether that object may have an actual story or force behind it. Usually, you may find that you take only one or two or zero pictures with this approach, and that's good enough. It's hard to make actually good pictures if you're shooting to shoot.

I think there also comes a time when it would help to research your subject and really build a relationship with it.

1MiB, 1685x1123, IMG_0764 (8) resize.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

nouveau Tue 16 Apr 2019 17:04:13 No.3465318 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3465400 >>3465809

Been ages, but finally went out and took some photos. It was just an hour and a half, but it felt good to dust off the camera again.

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

10 posts and 5 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Apr 2019 19:46:55 No.3465392 Report

Quoted By:

They like very generic photos. Somewhere there is a garden, there is a skinny basic bitch in the shrubs making squinty faces

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 16 Apr 2019 20:06:09 No.3465400 Report

Quoted By:

>>3465383
Don't bother, he's a classic geartroll.

>>3465318
I like the greens, good colour, without being distracting.
>>3465323
>>3465321
Not a fan of the bokeyed foreground. I get it's supposed to give depth, but it's kind of ugly.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 08:17:33 No.3465632 Report

Quoted By:

mind the objects in the foreground. They're distracting. Specially when they're just some big blob

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI Wed 17 Apr 2019 18:03:54 No.3465809 Report

Quoted By:

>>3465318
Good photos, good model, good location.

My only advice would be to use slightly lower apertures. My experience has been that f/4 is usually around where I like to shoot to get the model looking nice and sharp but still with the background at a portraity level of out of focus and no missed focus. Especially when using something like a 5D2 where the autofocus system is kinda shitty.

I'll occasionally bokehwhore with an f/1.2, but f/4 is usually where I find I like the results best.

(Obviously this is subjective since you might just value shallow DoF over nailing focus and getting crisp shots more than I do, which is fine--like I said, I still really like the shots)

giannis

giannis Wed 17 Apr 2019 18:39:55 No.3465827 Report

Quoted By:

>>3465383
I like the skin processing in this one, it's not over the top. I might have opted for a bit less though, cause in the OP (I guess also due to resizing) it looks a bit too smooth.

Also the shots look perfectly in focus to me.

379KiB, 1080x721, pic (1).jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 08 Apr 2019 17:36:14 No.3461396 View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

Have fun.

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

84 posts and 64 images omitted

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG-20190412-WA0008.jpg, 147KiB, 1600x1200

Anonymous Fri 12 Apr 2019 19:23:28 No.3463458 Report

Quoted By:

My son took this on his S8

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 Apr 2019 21:19:49 No.3463498 Report

Quoted By: >>3463507

The moab/creek photos are totally underwhelming and barely touch the potential of the area, which has been shot to death anyway. Its not enough to just shoot from the road.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 Apr 2019 21:39:51 No.3463507 Report

Quoted By:

>>3463498
Yeah, I regret not taking the time to do that area right.

Any general thoughts from what you've seen otherwise?

Thank you for the comment.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_0274.jpg, 289KiB, 1000x666

Anonymous Mon 15 Apr 2019 16:03:03 No.3464870 Report

Quoted By: >>3465795

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI Wed 17 Apr 2019 17:43:13 No.3465795 Report

Quoted By:

There are some pretty good shots in here. Too many for detailed critique, but here are some of the ones I particularly like:

>>3461411
>>3461413 although clean your sensor/heal-tool your pics.
>>3461416
>>3461418
>>3461424 for some reason
>>3461442 Be honest: Did you set that structure on fire for the cool picture?
>>3462241
>>3462245 Aww, it's a family
>>3462251
>>3462295
>>3462300 but it would be better if it were a bit less blurry
>>3464870

155KiB, 900x601, 41F11017-B880-43B2-8510-67E258057479.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 13:16:10 No.3465681 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3465697

Hey

Im thinking of starting a community where people can trade or give their unused equipment. Not for buying and selling (though you can negotiate something) but a place where people can donate or trade unwanted gear. I have a bunch of shit to give away because i mostly use nikon nowadays, but let me know if you guys are interested? Show me what you dont want and maybe youll want some of my gear

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 14:08:25 No.3465697 Report

Quoted By: >>3465713

>>3465681
you got any old digital point and shoot cameras?

The only foreseeable way this won't work is that people get greedy or don't follow through. For example pretty much every travel camera.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 14:57:59 No.3465713 Report

Quoted By: >>3465768

>>3465697
When i say community i mean like a way of arbitration and pseudo identity. I was thinking a chatroom

And yeah i got a dozen old point and shoots, digital and film

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 17:05:11 No.3465768 Report

Quoted By: >>3465787

>>3465713
Well as far as I know, there's just /p/ discord servers. discord.gg/bMYJUCe

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 17:36:52 No.3465787 Report

Quoted By:

>>3465768
Jesus that server is reddit

Join this instead

https://discord.gg/j8aH3vM

5MiB, 4000x3000, IMG_20180915_155719_HDR.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

(no editing done)

Meh Sun 14 Apr 2019 09:25:30 No.3464189 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3465775

>have more if interested

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Apr 2019 09:30:59 No.3464190 Report

Quoted By:

Looks absolutely dreadful

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Apr 2019 09:45:24 No.3464194 Report

Quoted By:

Well it's good that you toned down on the snapseed abuse

There's too much in the photo without a clear focal point, yes you have the lines leading towards the bridge but it's really hard to follow them

Personally I'd crop it to a portrait shot and use the bridge as a focal point, have the river be a diagonal leading up to it

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Apr 2019 11:18:55 No.3464220 Report

Quoted By:

>posting 5mb phone photos

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO moab1.jpg, 5MiB, 4500x3000

Anonymous Sun 14 Apr 2019 20:48:48 No.3464498 Report

Quoted By:

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI Wed 17 Apr 2019 17:13:42 No.3465775 Report

Quoted By:

>>3464189
Not terrible, especially for a cellphone shot.

Would've been better if you hadn't clipped the peak of the mountain in the background (especially since the river leads the eye right back there), and would be better with better gear and some editing, but subject and composition are decent.

2MiB, 4032x2268, 20190413_225411.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 14 Apr 2019 15:04:53 No.3464289 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3465763

pic from recently, how much of the black space around the main shape should I leave? I think fuck it all of it, would like other thoughts

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI Wed 17 Apr 2019 16:54:40 No.3465763 Report

Quoted By:

>>3464289
>I think fuck it all of it
If by this you mean "fuck it, I should leave all of the black space around the main shape", then I disagree.

If by that you mean "fuck it, fuck all of it, fuck this photo entirely", then that's closer to my feelings on it.

It's just not a very interesting photo. The "main shape" isn't really much more interesting to look at than any other picture of fluorescent lighting, it's all underexposed, and it just generally has the feel of a photo taken by accident while looking at the lens to see if you got a fingerprint on it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 16:59:23 No.3465766 Report

Quoted By:

You have to think like a mosquito dude

They're prison cells with fluorescent bars

315KiB, 1600x1200, FILE0043.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 06 Apr 2019 14:21:35 No.3460404 View Reply Last 50 Original Report

Quoted By:

The London Underground, 2005

[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

82 posts and 38 images omitted

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 Apr 2019 08:00:00 No.3464164 Report

Quoted By:

>>3464040
Turn your trip back on, ambush. And you’re not really thinking the occasional shitty deer in a containment thread outweighs the incessant stream of shitposting all over the board, right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 05:49:25 No.3465611 Report

Quoted By:

>>3460461
>>3460464
>>3460465
>>3460496
some of these people were looking at phones, are you blind? texting was huge back in 2005

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 08:49:03 No.3465636 Report

Quoted By:

>>3460425
I just knew it was going to have Mitchell in it. Fucking repost of a repost of a repost.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 17 Apr 2019 11:15:06 No.3465657 Report

Quoted By:

Lived in London 2010-2015. Definitely didn't have the same pleasant atmosphere as these photos by the time I left.

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI

ac !!hMB1p2jaDAI Wed 17 Apr 2019 16:50:54 No.3465762 Report

Quoted By:

>>3460447
Now be good children and go to sleep at bedtime or curvyman will slither into your bedrooms and steal all of your hair and shirts.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Camera Model	AE-1 Program
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Height	1037
Equipment Make	Cannon
Color Space Information	sRGB
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.72.004 (171201)
Image Width	1565

Firmware Version	1.02.8.7091
Image Created	2019:04:14 21:44:47
Highlight	0
Color Adjustment	1
White Balance	Auto
Shadow	0
Focal Length Range	50
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Space Information	sRGB
Drive Mode	SINGLE
Camera Software	SIGMA Photo Pro 6.4.1.4167
Serial Number	90609357
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Quality	10
Camera Model	SIGMA DP3 Merrill
Unique Image ID	30303630393335371F3F864F31393143
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
Flash	No Flash
Focus Setting	AF-S
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Autofocus Mode	AF-S
Saturation	0
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Exposure	-0.7
Metering Mode	8
Image Height	1000
Contrast	0
Sharpness	-1
Image Width	1500
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	A
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Fill Light	0
Adjustment Mode	Custom
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Equipment Make	SIGMA
Resolution	HI

Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

Image Created	2019:04:16 17:33:48
White Balance	Manual
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
F-Number	f/2.0
Exposure Program	Manual
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.4
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Image Height	1123
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Image Width	1685
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Rendering	Normal
Pixel Composition	RGB
Exposure Mode	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Equipment Make	Canon

Threads by latest replies - Page 15

On these archives

On these boards

Your latest searches

fake it till we make it

Photojournalism

(no editing done)

Horizontal Resolution	6300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	6300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

Image Created	2019:04:15 01:32:53
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Time	15 sec
White Balance	Auto
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Focal Length	18.00 mm
Metering Mode	Pattern
Color Space Information	sRGB
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 8.1 (Windows)
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Rendering	Normal
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1300D
Photographer	David Marrero
Exposure Mode	Manual
F-Number	f/11.0
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Manual
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Equipment Make	Canon

Image Created	2018:09:15 15:57:19
Brightness	2.8 EV
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
White Balance	Auto
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Focal Length	3.83 mm
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Image Height	3000
Time (UTC)	10:57:17
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
ISO Speed Rating	125
Camera Model	Redmi 5
Exposure Mode	Auto
F-Number	f/2.2
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	4 mm
Exposure Program	Not Defined
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Equipment Make	Xiaomi
Date (UTC)	2018:09:15

Image Created	2019:03:26 15:50:22
Brightness	7.2 EV
White Balance	Auto
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Light Source	Unknown
Color Space Information	sRGB
Camera Software	ILCE-6000 v3.10
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Camera Model	ILCE-6000
F-Number	f/5.0
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Saturation	Normal
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Metering Mode	Pattern
Image Height	4000
Contrast	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Image Width	6000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	82 mm
Equipment Make	SONY

Image Created	2019:04:13 22:54:11
Brightness	2.2 EV
White Balance	Auto
Focal Length	4.20 mm
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Light Source	Unknown
Color Space Information	sRGB
Camera Software	G930VVRU4BQH4
ISO Speed Rating	64
Exposure Bias	-0.6 EV
Camera Model	SM-G930V
Unique Image ID	C12QSJK01SM
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Flash	No Flash
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Height	2268
Metering Mode	Spot
Image Width	4032
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	26 mm
Equipment Make	samsung

Comment	v1.405_20040419000854
Image Created	2005:06:04 18:28:21
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.4
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Focal Length	7.45 mm
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Image Height	1200
Color Space Information	sRGB
Camera Software	EXIF Software Version 0.06a
Image Width	1600
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1/11 EV
Camera Model	H-10
F-Number	f/3.5
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Flash	No Flash
Equipment Make	www.axisoft.com