Threads by latest replies - Page 7

No.3523430 ViewReplyOriginalReport
hey what does this button do should i click it
1 post omitted

No.3523833 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What comes to mind when you see this face
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
19 posts and 3 images omitted

No.3522544 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What comes to mind when you see this face
29 posts and 2 images omitted

No.3524164 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What comes to mind when you see this face
2 posts omitted

No.3488493 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Are there Fujifilm X-Series photographer here? What's your camera and your favorite lenses?

Any recommended third party lenses?
322 posts and 54 images omitted

/p/ Needs Inspiration: Roll Thread

No.3509953 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Roll thread, get some inspiration.
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
96 posts and 10 images omitted

No.3523836 ViewReplyOriginalReport
best program to easily browse raw files on pc? windows default photos one takes ages, straight up doesn't work sometimes and changes the color after a second or two
3 posts omitted

Please advise

No.3520947 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Hi friends, I´m playing around with my new scanner, which i recently bought.

I´m scanning Kodak Gold 200-7 film from my last vacation to Japan. I had a fair bit of trouble getting the colors right. I scanned a few frames which I quite like - please advice if these are any good.

I scan negativ images with Vuescan and flip them using the Negative lab pro plugin for lightroom. I had the best results, if I left a bit of the frame inside the picture, I think it helps the program to determine the base color.

Trying to improve the quality, I did whitebalance on a section of the film border, but I found the results better if I omited this step. Furthermore I tried tiff, RAW DNG and jpg. Funnily enough i liked the jpg results most, with the bonus of smaller files.

Please see the pictures and advise how to make it better.
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
7 posts and 4 images omitted

/mpg/ - Macro Photography General

No.3488078 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Post macro related images here.

Previous: >>3474286
229 posts and 149 images omitted

/DST/ Digishit Thread

!egyYvoBZV2 No.3521394 ViewReplyOriginalReport
ITT, you post pictures taken with shitty digicams.

Everything still matters like composition and lighting, but you have to use the shittiest digital compact you have, bonus points if you don't have to resize to get under 1000px longest side. Digital artifacts are not only welcomed, they are encouraged.

All gear discussion ITT should be about finding the shittiest gear and shooting with it.

Pic related, 4.0mp Canon A80
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
20 posts and 20 images omitted