Threads by latest replies - Page 8
Moscow, Russia, 2:30
Daymn this hobby: I thought i'd spent enough time researching before I made my, expensive, purchase; but, I fucked up.. I bought a sigma 18-35, f/1.8 - expensive lens. I should of bought two primes for a fraction of the price. Can anyone make me feel better about this lens, I am a newb and not a pro yet.
That's a nice sounding lens. Never used it, but it sounds great. 18-35 at 1.8 should give you a nice general walk around lens for 90% of scenarios, you can even do some portraiture at the 35 end to be honest.
That lens is absolutely good for video, but in no way a photo lens
Get a hobby that's not for bottom feeder nerds with delusions of artistic excellence whilst they fiddle about adjusting values in LR.
Painting for example. That's the REAL deal.
quality post, bro. pat yourself on the back
You didn't even say what's wrong. Where you expecting skill to be batched together with it?
Can anyone help out with what mount this is?
Also it looks like a k/ar mount
But you can make it fit a Nikon f or Canon EOS with a little bit of love.. though you may need a towel for support, no rust to the lens or body though
it is a sony E mount
Fuji X mount
Pentax or Minolta, I'd need to see the lens on the side but it's one of those two
Best guess: the Ricoh k-mount, second guess: Olympus om-mount
Downfall of civilization edition
Post photos and give some criticism
To be fair, these chemicals are very old, now that I've been reminded, I'll change them for next time
Image Created 2017:06:23 16:40:21 Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.7 Exposure Time 1/40 sec White Balance Auto Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Focal Length 4.30 mm Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image Height 1770 Metering Mode Pattern Color Space Information sRGB Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Elements 10.0 Windows Image Width 2410 ISO Speed Rating 200 Exposure Bias 0 EV Rendering Normal Camera Model Canon PowerShot SX40 HS Exposure Mode Auto F-Number f/4.0 Scene Capture Type Standard Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Lens Aperture f/4.0 Flash No Flash Equipment Make Canon
Obscure Slide Film Edition
>>3092627 → >This is a place to post about anything film related. Processing, scanning, developing, gear, etc is all fair game. Let's fill this thread with images so please include an image with your post.
>Have fun! Remember, there are no stupid questions, only stupid answers.
>People looking to get their photos critiqued please include the film, lens and camera used to give some context.
>Any post without an image attached should be ignored because the poster is obviously incompetent.
Best light meter app? Need something that spot meters well so i can do that highlight shit
Maybe this is a stupid question, but is it possible go develop these films in D76 and get a decent result? I've found them in flea-market cameras and I'm too cheap/broke to develop them at the local photo store.
the one you have on you
I've developed a bit of color film in D-76 before. Typically I find a similar black and white film and then add a couple minutes to the time. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't so good luck.
Digital, It's to clean and ugly. Has zero aesthetic. Anyone else feel that? Every picture just looks so bland or like a magazine add.
some races are better looking than others, and some races always look like literal shit, deal with it.
you can always delete the OP pic, without killing the thread.
no, too late, as in you're already shitposting
>any snapshot can look aesthetic if I just overexpose by a few stops >digital
I actually have to put effort into things like light exposure and composition as well as post processing because I can't fall back on hipster memes
Le fixer 4 u.
>Has zero aesthetic. God damn i wish people would stop misusing that word.
Yeah I feel that. Digital is super gay.
>use a given camera brand for years because it works for you
>never think much of it, never worry about gear or other brands
>see people trolling that brand non-stop
>start to feel weirdly proud and protective of your brand choice
>continue not caring about other brands
What are some good cameras to take pictures with. Like nature and stuff you guys.
>>3100286 >what are some good cameras to take pictures with
What ever camera you have on you will be best camera.
You need at least a 645 with a digital back. Not using a medium format as your minimum makes you a mere poser here.
Best Photography related Youtuber out there, hands down.
>>3100586 >this is what americans think a witty retort is
People are more suspicious nowadays, thanks to the breakdown of the public square, the rise of the security state, pedophiles, and callout culture.
most (like 99%) sexual attacks and abuse on kids are inside the family by normally functioning heteros aka. fathers and uncles. the "pedo menace" is a huge media lie.
t. not pedo.
I think he meant the pedo-scare by the media.
You're right. Which is not to say that pedos can't be hetero.
ITT: Post only photographs you've sold prints of.