>>3537327>what do phone sales
Sorry, missed the link >>3536902
Shouldn't really have to show you the same evidence twice tho. >my fuji never does that
Pic related, that's a fuji jpeg, so not the typical Adobe problems. Nice skin coloured teeth and eye whites, mmmmm. That waxy skin tone, just great. >how often you run into moire
The burden of proof is still on you to show xtrans does produce objectively less moire, and you've not come close, and the physics says it should make no difference at all... Ignoring synthesised tests is ignoring the reality, we know fuji adds a fuck ton of colour nr baked into their raws to deal with fake colour caused by xtrans.>but crop outsells ff
Crayola outsell caran d'ache, how relevant are crayola to a fine artist?
What you're doing is you're holding up your bright yellow plastic crayola colouring pencil set and insisting that they are "good enough" for a fine artist.
Which says one of two things, you either don't have a fucking clue what you're doing so can't tell the difference, or you're trying to protect your pride, you know they suck, but you can't afford caran d'ache, so you stand their, tears i your eyes, begging for anyone to believe you, for that little bit of validation. Then your mom comes over and says that she really likes your crayola pictures, they have a quality that no one with real artists pencils can achieve, a waxy unevenness that is endearing to her>I'm very sad that you're shitposting and making fun of me on 4chan
Holy fuck, if you're too thin skinned to be anonymous and have your pov mocked to fuck, I'd hate to think how you would survive on social media with accountability. I'd be looking you up daily on reddit to tell you that you're a fucking idiot faggot>a sonygger
I prefer specs to brands, if your equipment is of a professional quality I see no issue with it
Meme shit though, like crop,f1.2 or faster lenses, retro aesthetics and jpeg filters are just ripe for taking the piss out of