Well i think you saw that your meaningful feedback didn’t reach it's target. Why should i value some uncommented movie analogy more than some unfounded anon comments which says they like my pictures?
What did this give me to work with? Nothing.
i understand i am not a great artist, hence maybe not even an artist, and i never said i was. i am not resting on these photos but i am proud of them. you could see them as a profile of what i shot last year.
And since /p/ had some influence on my way from technically bad documents of what i do, to (I think )at least technically acceptable documents, I shared them here.
i am sorry that these bore you, others somehow find them interesting. and you are wrong if you think i don’t strive for more and think i am on the pinnacle of my photography.
6 of my prints from last year are enjoyed by various people. Fair enough, 3 of them in Friends’ apartments, but of the other 3 one hangs in a lawyers office, who asked a friend of a friend If they knew someone with Landscape shots, and the other 2 in a doctors office in the next small town.
Sure they’re more accessories than pieces of art, but for that case they don’t need to be more.>>3060432 was a try of putting something meaningful into a photo, but sans nobody ever really notices it i failed obviously, i will try again.
You looked for something in my Photos that you obviously not found, but still gave me nothing more as feedback than that they bore you and I should strive for more.
why don’t you give me a bit more to work with, so maybe next time when I post here you can enjoy my stuff aswell?
so if you could take more than 30 seconds and give me some real critique on these shots I am very happy to accept it.