>>3519708>B&W, subject on the lower left, tons of negative space>>3519709>>3519821
I'm not the other anon, but >>3519408
I think you should keep following it, but your definition is too simple. Add to it! In every single picture you should play with the conditions in an interesting way.>>3518048
Here you have two massive elements, the cloud cover and the massive sky above. The lighthouse is graceful. Notice how the lighthouse is isolated with foreground background differences in grayscale.>>3518421
The background and the building are disdainful, the building looks put there carelessly. In contrast, the background offers kind of a spotlight for the building and there are pretty reflections in the upper windows. I wish there would be more focus on the upper windows.>>3519708
I think I would have found it exciting if the sky was clear again at the top, so only the bottommost clouds remained. The building seems to "look" out of the frame. I don't know how to put this yet.>>3519709
It's the most typical building in the series which I expect in such a view. The other buildings look rather out of place. Nevertheless, I find something about this, but not tangible.