>>3860014>it's an almost textbook example of a brutalist buidling
It's apparent concrete "apparent"?>No
Built by the communists but is that a factor into making it brutalist?>Actually no
It isn't one of the fancy ones, or the interesting ones, so is its mundane nature part of the brutalism?>No
Then it isn't you stupid donkey humper.>Brutalist buildings are characterised by minimalist constructions
False, see works of their founders: Marcel Breuer, Charles Jeanneret, Paul Rudolph>showcase the bare building materials and structural elements over decorative design
True, the structural work is in part the decorative design based on bewilderment>makes use of exposed concrete or brick, angular geometric shapes and a predominantly monochrome
Partially false, it is usually concrete only but usually textured, can or cannot be monochrome, it depends.>Check, check and check.
Your picture does not check them because it breaks with the rules. You are an illiterate gorilla nigger, fuck your school and its playground.