>>1843079>They're being willfully obtuse, it's their primary debate tactic. It's no different from a child acting cute in order to avoid getting in trouble.>Saying something obtuse is not an argument. You're a pseudo intellectual.
You claimed the initial post was being obtuse, yet it's being rather clear in its statement. There's a tendency on /pol/ for posters trying to defend their stance to be obtuse by pretending to be ignorant of why their stance has a flaw, such as "what do you mean?" and "I don't understand", especially when the flaw is clearly obvious. The communists do it all the fucking time, natsocs pull that shit quite a fair bit and libertarians are notorious for it. It's not so much the ideology but the posters that pull that shit. It seems to stem more from a lack of knowledge regarding their preferred system than anything else but it's become increasingly common on /pol/.