Hopefully fixed an issue with the search server going down and additionally an issue with error 500 pages. Additional announcements still upcoming. Threads by latest replies - Page 11
what focal range is most accurate to real life/what other people see with their eyes?
what is that for
The main problem here is that the woman chosen as a subject is super uggo.
Shame this lens doesn't have AF
The porn industry has focus pullers that ruin the entire video because they keep missing focus which is incredibly obvious when you're so immersed to the media and are wondering why in fucks name your eyes can't focus on something that is blurry
Thankful canon has taken this step forward however. The 8k 60p video that comes out of that dual lense is going to look inches away from real life with a head set that can handle the resolution
Is that the one you have to keep paying Canon a subscription fee to use?
75 for magnification, 28 for FOV.
Please give me your critiques.
sorry but noone cares. to most of us its just a badly exposed photo with a guy walking. you cant have a paragraph to tell the meaning, the photo itself should do that.
When the composition and basic technical qualities of an image are so bad, it's hard to try and attach a deeper meaning without it becoming laughable. Save this photo somewhere and keep shooting, shoot as often as you can. You'll look back on it and cringe, I promise you that.
I know it's ridiculous because I didn't even know how the controls on the camera work and the LCD was turned off. In other words, I simply triggered the shutter without even a slight dea of the composition. As a result, the shutter speed wasn't fast enough, the aperture wasn't opened enough , the default of the positive film look in camera all mounted to a technically bad image. But, on the other hand, images are just signs for communication, and what images just like any other signs try to communicate, in essence, is meaning, isn't it? So all the bad shadows and strong contrast are simply metaphors, commonly accepted metaphors in the Western visual arts since the Renaissance.
Assuming you're not baiting, all your image is communicating is the fact that you don't yet know how to take a good photo. You can attach all the meaning in the world to it, no one will be able to get over the hurdle that is an ugly photograph. You have to detach from your images and view them objectively sometimes; you can't expect anyone to feel the same way you do about your photos when all they see is a poorly composed blurry shot of an ugly guy walking into shadows.
It's like IRL. No one wants to sit and hear out the ugly incel, but they'll hear a beautiful girl out all day. Commonly accepted metaphors in Western visual arts do not apply to a photography that can barely be considered art.
Due to the dangerously high levels of based from the recent RICOH/Pentax announcement, a new containment thread has been opened (title is subject to change)
DSLR is not dead, RICOH/Pentax just announced 6 variants of the new K-3 MkIII: >Jet black >Gunmetal >modified release button (?) >Monochrome >Astro (no IR filter) >MF (possible manual focus, maybe with manual focusing screen as well?) >They also mentioned the idea of a full frame manual model, which could be a lot smaller than the K-1 by removing some of the automation New camera, monochrome, manual focusing screen, almost as light and small as a film SLR, digital, with Limited lenses. There's plenty to discuss
>>3990574 >The future does not look bright for Pentacks.
The future is pretty grim to all electronics producers, not just cameras, Snoy had to halt production and Canon/Nikon will soon to follow.
If you hadn't noticed the free country of Taiwan is under direct threat from the communist blight of china while russia is making preparing an invasion and directly threatening the EU.
We are at the brink of WW3 my friend, be happy you got things up until now.
>>3983754 >K3 vf is just as big as FF
Even though it's advertised with a 70% size viewfinder? Ok anon.
Sensorlet & DSLR cope is so pathetic and obvious.
K-3 MkIII uses a pentaprism with a new material so the view is much brighter and can be magnified more. Put on the O-ME53 and you have a FF sized viewfinder.
>>3990592 >We are at the brink of WW3
People have been saying this for the majority of the last 70 years.
Did you just realize we have a history of the last 100 years?
today i tried to make some photos today with my 10-18mm lense, not sure yet how to manage it properly. any feedback is and all tipps are appreciated, thanks even for just looking at them x)
in my language its linse
>>3990716 >The ones' where your subject is close make it for me.
mm aight, i figured today the best way would be to have something giant in the back but also something very small, close to the cam. going from one extreme to the other. not sure yet how to implement it
>to avoid the keystone lines
can you elaborate pls? what are keystone lines:p
> Also, have fun! Wide-angle lenses provide plenty to play with!
lel just remembered when i played with this lense before by zooming in and out while shooting
nope nvm those were made with a 15-45 mm lens rip
Probably because lenses
Is he the best at what he does? Over rated or under rated?
Hi would i be able to get any context on this image, i've seen it used in a few memes and wanted to know where its from or what is happening in the image
Mildly edited, looks pretty good.
Looks pretty nice to me. have any more?
Hey anons, I am starting to get into photography and ive noticed this while taking picstures of friends for their instagrams- they are looking naturally photogenic and i feel like every picture i get taken of myself looks like utter dogshit. idk if its me just hating myself and being cynical or whatever but how can i come off as more photogenic and look good? i have a resting bitch face and people always think im mad- im not. I hate my smile but people say its fine. Im just trying to find angles, methods or whatever to make shots look the best and make good qualities stand out? i have a basic nixon digital camera but is there anything better you recommend? exucse the retarded long ass post
>>3982503 >idk if its me just hating myself
> I hate my smile but people say its fine.
People are full of shit. I've lost quite some weight and all the fuckers that kept telling me I looked fine when I was fat now tell me how much better I look and it was really bad before.
>>3982503 >basic nixon digital camera
>>3982503 >they are looking naturally photogenic and i feel like every picture i get taken of myself looks like utter dogshit.
Congratulations you’re a natural-born photographer.
Nixon looks like fuji kind of guy. You know, somebody who appreviates how compact an x100 can be for his street photography tumblr.
which film sim lookls the best?
first one is the F2 setting, the rest are as follows F1,F1a,F1b,F1c,F1c max saturation, F1c Max Tonality, F1c, max saturation, lower tonality and WB 5900K
I'm a fan of the first and the last but I'll choose the first since the shades of blue are lovely
Sounds like you need to post an example.
I dont shoot slide film, i shoot digital because it emulates slide film and always has.
Don't meet your heroes, I guess.
Why shoot fake digital when u got real digital
Why shoot film if not for film look
I was pretty happy with the a7s1 before it broke. Just missed the 4k.
I know the a7s3 is great.... But what about buying the a7s2 instead? People seem to sell them now because everybody wants the 3....
Stop it, fagoat. My 'Sony is broken, what do' question was first.
Also, use the gear thread. Newfagoat.