Threads by latest replies - Page 5
You know the drill. Post your gram, but you have to review others.
I didn't say you HAVE to be overly nice but at least don't be an obnoxious kid who's just putting down for no other reason than to put down.
pls no bulli
Just make some account to dump my snapshots. No general theme really. How bad am i?
>>3769316 >mass follows in the desperate hope for follow backs >still got only a 0.0something% engagement >putting down for no other reason than to put down.
Just go back to plebbit, kindergarten or whatever safe space of your choice.
As requested, I'm starting my own thread. To begin, I'll repost a good list of people to look at for inspiration:
August Sander Evelyn Hofer Bruce Wrighton Malick Sibide Hiroh Kikai Andrea Modica Richard Avedon Judith Joy Ross Michael Joseph Bryan Schutmaat Bruce Davidson Karlheinz Weinberg Mike Disfamer Katy Grannan EJ Belloq Peter Hujar John Myer David Hilliard Larry Sultan Doug Dubois nother list Zanele Muholi Matthew Brady Ilse Bing Diane Arbus Lee Miller Vivian Maier Lee Friedlander Robert Mapplethorpe Peter Hujar Cindy Sherman Phil Toledano Nan Goldin Elinor Carucci Jen Davis Latoya Ruby Frazier Shen Wei Evan Blaise Walsh Jess Dugan Pieter Hugo Masahisa Fukase Larry Clark Elinor Carucci Will Steacy Duane Michaels Phillip-Lorca Dicorcia Tom Bianchi PaJaMa
This was almost 5 years ago, but as I recall, she was a frantic speaker and engaged in some magical thinking (connecting disparate events without reason). Not long after, I remember joking to a mutual friend that it was the first time I'd felt I was in the presence of a woman who would murder me. They both slept on the couch, him at 6'6 and her a full foot shorter, at least. No idea how that was comfortable. Wilder times than now. Haven't seen that friend in years. He had a penchant for wearing mechanic's jumpsuits. Somewhere I've got a really shitty photo of him in one, if you'll excuse the quality, I'll include it with the post. No claim to this being a great shot.
For this one, I had her put a wad of cardboard in her mouth. Wanted to see if it would make her chin look larger. I didn't like what it did to her lips.
post ur snaps from old, obsolete, or just grubby digicams
The following are tolerated and encouraged: -sandpaper fruit loops noise -no dynamic range -artifacting -glitches from dying A/D converter don't worry about resizing, you can get fast download speeds in the middle of the fucking amazon jungles these days. let's see that bonus points for ridiculous gear
Anything can be a subject if you need it to.
I'm so glad I have a gorillapod now, because the image stabalisation on this thing sucks utter ass.
Some vivitar shit from like 10 years ago. It was the cheapest digital camera I could find at walmart at the time. Internal storage only, not even a slot for an SD card. Makes every photo look spooky
I quite like it. It's almost an example of Pictorialism.
Raw (KDC) or Tiff?
sharing some pics i made in the last months, pls let me know what you think any feedback and tips are appreciated, just started with photography and want to become better
>>3769490 >>3769521 >>3769696
I like these. I don't have much to comment on them, other than to say the second one gives off lynchian vibes. You live a more interesting life than I do anon.
General threads are best.
Discus: pentax bodies, lenses, and sweet v i n t a g e glass.
Has anyone fixed the solenoid failure themself? I had it on a used K-S1 and it put me off Pentax especially as they're supposed to be known for being reliable.
But now I see there's a few ebay items going cheap with the failure. How hard is the repair?I wouldn't mind a K-S2.
He's right. There's something that really bothers my eyes when looking at the rocks at the top.
Was this taken with a K-50?
It's just been badly edited. To much purple and magenta, and they've tried to compensate by upping the saturation on the reds and oranges
it's a velvia 50 slide
Imagine being so blissfully unaware that the photo literally named Velvia still confuses you.
When I try to run aperture mode the shutter speed at 1.8 on my M3 is atrocious and I can't find a way to 'untether' them if that's even possible or get the piece of shit to not run 1" shutter even at higher ISO.
How can I shoot good bokeh with this thing at 1" shutter time on A-Priority?
for a portable front pocket cam with 24mp, afaik your only options are GR II/III or XF10 with f2.8, 28mm equiv lens. or X100 variants but bigger, or go MILC for the zoom capability.
erase the GR II since it has 16mp
I'll get a used XF10 in time. I don't mind lugging the 24mp Nikon around and desu it's itll mostly be used for food pics. Not worth the money yet.
Ask this in the gear thread, anon
Anyone fix their own shit? You do fix your own cameras, don't you?
My most recent repair, RF calibration, basic CLA on this Fuji GS645S. The rod that slides the RF back and forth was gunked up and I pulled it apart and cleaned it.
does anyone have a picture of the circuit board/electronics that are inside RZ67 Z series lens shutters?
When metering suddenly stops working on a 70s camera, surely thats just a bad connection or something? Is it usually difficult to diagnose, or can I expect to see an obviously unconnected wire somewhere?
may have to do some soldering but it seems doable. what camera and does it have a selenium cell or something else?
anyone have experience with re-cementing lens groups?
Its an Olympus 35SP. It took mercury batteries, but I have been using the hearing aid ones. It has spot or center weighted metering and essentially P mode. What a gem, really..
I have a budget $150 USD. Whats the best picture I can get for $150? :^)
Is it worth getting film camera as a beginner? I dont know about them, but i imagine film rolls, digitizing and all would be quite a hassle to start
No, it's a hipster meme. Digital allows you to see the results on the spot, it flattens the learning curve a lot.
Film requires less post-processing to get gorgeous colors but that's it. If you want your stuff to look like it was shot on film get a Sigma Merrill.
>>3764917 >big numbers good
spotted the coping dicklet
Do you use a macro lens to take pics of your own butthole?
Look into g9 for 4k. I've researched this a bunch, and it fits my requirements.
Ibis, log, 4k 60,
been a hot minute /p/, im gonna dump some lowlight portraits ive taken and the usual night shots i do
Anyways, feel free to post your lowlight shots here too Also, if anyone wants the RAW file to any of these pics to edit and mess around with, just tell me which one and ill upload a link for ya
Good to see you around!
Super awesome processing on these, specially these:
>>3760043 >>3760061 >>3760063 >>3760066 >>3760069 >>3760048
This 105mm is fucking dreamy, damn
i like this, it has a lot of potential for vaporwave editing
thanks man i really appreciate it, yeah that 105mm is out of this world good, someone here in casper was selling it brand new for $400 and basically didnt know what they were selling
this is a blackout that happened in my city
I hate women , so fuck you
no women is interesting enough to be pictured
what an abomination
Is there any good beginner guide to getting into night time photography or is it just one of those just do it kinda things.
— Post smart photographic questions in this thread.
— Post stupid gear questions in /Gear/ thread.
There is 0.5% chance that your potential smart question was already posted in previous /SQT/:
I want to skip algorithm shit and get the best quality from my camera for lower resolution files.
I have a 6000x4000 pixel sensor and it's bayer so each pixel only gets one color sample. I want to reduce my resolution so that every pixel has its own RGB value captured per pixel. Currently I can accomplish what I want my using passthrough demosaicing and fucking around in an editor afterwards but it's annoying to do. Is there a proper name or method for doing this? I would think "Quad Pixel" but smartphones already coined that phrase, and it's named for combining subpixels of the same color behind the same filter just for binning purposes and hardware based noise reduction, so the 48MP phones aren't actually 48MP. They're actually hardware limited to 16MP (1/4) due to design.
ive always had this weird thing against using software to edit photos in any way at all, i feel like once you start playing with shit you lose all of the emotion that you took in the original photo.
am i just being dumb or does using photoshop or lightroom or whatever really have any benefits im too stubborn to realise?
ive read them all :/
I'll give it a go thanks