Threads by latest replies - Page 5


No.3878053 ViewReplyOriginalReport
why didn't it caught on?
7 posts and 1 image omitted

No.3875052 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>5 gorrilion pointless """"""kodachrome"""""" recipes that don't look like film anyway
>not a single recipe emulating CCD colors of classic digital cameras
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
238 posts and 57 images omitted

film rangefinder vs film SLR

No.3881333 ViewReplyOriginalReport
i want to get into film photography. are film rangefinders (preferably those with AF like contax g/konica hexar af) worth the money? i know that in theory they should produce better pictures (no moving mirror = less vibrations = sharper images) but i'm not sure if that justifies the huge price difference between similar SLR & rangefinder setups (canon eos 50e + 28mm 2.8 = $200, contax g1 + 28mm 2.8 = $1000)
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
6 posts omitted

Smart phone photography

No.3881340 ViewReplyOriginalReport
This thread is for smart phone photographers. We can show the ilc copers that we can create kino just as good as they can. Look at this f1. 0 equivalent aperture shot.
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
14 posts and 6 images omitted

No.3881588 ViewReplyOriginalReport
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

No.3881494 ViewReplyOriginalReport
What's the best compact for stills and video?
3 posts omitted

No.3880775 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Are there any cameras similar to the Epson RD-1 that people recommended for film emulation type photos?
19 posts and 1 image omitted

/ihg/ - Industrie- und Handelsgesellschaft General

No.3875263 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
ITT we talk about the modern wonders of Ihagee's camera line, including but not limited to the Exakta, aka, a fine and noble piece of photographic equipment suitable for all lovers of photography
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
102 posts and 34 images omitted

No.3879540 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Inspired by >>3875696, I was curious to see if people could actually tell if a photo was taken on a thicc Sony sensor stack or a slender, extremely-microlens'd Leica sensor, so here's a little test.

Here's 14 random pictures I took the other day walking around the city. Half of them are taken with a Sony A7 II, the other half with a Leica M9. Lenses are either a 7Artisans 35/2 or a Voigtländer Ultron 28/1.9, which I sort of swapped back and forth as I was walking around, but I'm not sure if I favored one or the other on one or the other camera in the final 14 shots I took.

See if you can guess which are from which camera.
56 posts and 15 images omitted

/DST/ Digishit Thread

No.3839206 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
ITT, you post pictures taken with shitty digicams.

Everything still matters like composition and lighting, but you have to use the shittiest digital compact you have, bonus points if you don't have to resize to get under 1000px longest side. Digital artifacts are not only welcomed, they are encouraged. OP picture has two dead pixels.

All gear discussion ITT should be about finding the shittiest gear and shooting with it.
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
105 posts and 67 images omitted