Threads by latest replies - Page 7

No.3918760 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Serious question: How did people take portraits before eye AF?
10 posts and 2 images omitted

/Eggy/ General - High ISO edition

No.3910060 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Ooof, that MFT noise at high iso... what were you doing Eggy?
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
310 posts and 89 images omitted

No.3915623 ViewReplyOriginalReport
So whats the deal with it? Haven‘t been ok it since 10 years. Do you use it? If so, for what purpose?
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
39 posts and 3 images omitted

/POG/ Pentax Orgy General

No.3917461 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Based Edition.

Post some hella pics my dudes.
22 posts and 7 images omitted


No.3915122 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Do you have a photo printer? If so, what have you got and how did you choose it? Which printer would you get now?

I had a "goddamn" moment a while back:
>be me at family gathering
>grandma whoops out family album
>look at 30 year old prints taken with shitty cheap cams for hours
>decide to print a few of my pics the next day
>even sharpen for printing, export to cmyk, all the jazz
>mine look worse. $5K worth of gear mogged by a 30yo film point and shit

How is this possible, /p/? Why does digital suck so bad as soon as it gets printed?
11 posts and 1 image omitted

what lens

No.3917105 ViewReplyOriginalReport
6 posts omitted


No.3905352 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Recently I was thinking about how hard it is to "make it" as photographer these days. With everyone having a smartphone and instagram I feel like the value of photography dropped almost entirely. Doesn't matter how good your pictures are. There's way too much noise to stand out and algorithms won't help you either.
All that made me procrastinate and binge watching movies over past couple weeks which sort of gave me some new ideas. If photography is dead why not just switch to videos? It's pretty much same but
>Youtube is still a good platform for creators where your work can actually get discovered and get some traction
>Prosumer cameras are getting very close to high end "pro" equipment allowing you to shoot LF on a budget
>Editing hardware/software is very affordable too
>Producing videos takes way more hustle than stills so the value still there
>Normies with their phones can't even into horizontal shooting
>More career options and ways to make money off it
Is there any reasons not to? I don't think so. We just entered golden age of cinematography and it's about the time to jump on that train before it's too late like it is with photography.
86 posts and 12 images omitted

Camera for amateur

No.3905085 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
Alright /p/, I’m new to photography and I want to buy my first camera. My main requirements is that it should be portable but still take better photos than my iPhone. I do not want to exceed 1100$. I was thinking about starting with the Sony a6000, is it a good choice still in 2021? Or should I with the more expensive a6400 or any other camera? Any advice is appreciated.
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
191 posts and 33 images omitted

Rate my photography. Just an amateur photographer trying to get my name out there

No.3919511 ViewReplyOriginalReport
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]

No.3917471 ViewReplyLast 50OriginalReport
>the uncomfortable design of a 30+ year old camera with the limitations of cheap hardware on a digital sensor
>purchased by consoomers for the sole purpose of "aesthetics"
[Exif data available. Click here to show/hide.]
89 posts and 8 images omitted