>>3799794>Addressed above, no modern ilc camera is 'poor' for video. This is needless hyperbole.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ri9ZGTGgV8
If that video isn't "good enough" quality-wise for you then I don't really know what to tell you.
700 dollars for good enough is not good enough. You at least expect camera for 700 dollars to do proper 4k today. m50 does not do thatl! 8mp centre crop from 24mp sensor kill the usability of all the lenses that you put on them. It kills aperture and focal length. Even if you wished to shill cannon there are better cameras. m50 really is the worst of the worst, and frankly very dubious thing that op is doing. https://www.eoshd.com/news/warning-4k-canon-eos-m50/>Also addressed above. No one is shilling it. The op recommends it to people too dumb to do their own research. Why are you even posting if you're incapable of following a conversation?
This was addressed already. Op recommending m50 to noobs and people too dumb to do their own research is extremely questionable procedure. Noobs won't even know that cam is restricted to crop mode on 4k. At best they will buy a camera thinking it's apsc sensor doing 4k. This can be termed as shilling.>Ef lenses adapt really easily to ef-m with full af ability.
Why? Every system can adapt Ef lenses. It's still only adapted lens.>The sony e mount also adapts fairly easily I'm pretty sure.
That's just completely false. Find me ef-m to e mount adapter.
Can you answer honestly?
1. Why does this upset you so much?
OP is shilling shitty cam to newbies.
2. Have you even looked in the sticky?
I have now. It's outdated, possibly another example of op shilling:
1. No mention of Sigma FP.
2. No mention of Z cams.
3. Advising eos7d in 2021???
4. No mention of Fuji?! X-T4 anyone? Undoubtedly the best mid budget option right now! Weird.
Can you answer honestly. Why is that? Can you also answer also why are you so keen on defending him? Why can't op defend himself? Is it because you are op?