>>3319695>why shouldnt i portray my work the way i want, too?
because contrary to newfag beliefs, there are actual objective guidelines and technical points that should be addressed in pictures and it's not necessarily auto-art because you feel like it is. why even post here if you're clearly resistant to C&C? you've already decided you're as good as you want to be and as good as people who have been doing it for 10+ years? this isn't the place for you if you think you're hot shit. post that picture in any thread and it will get torn to pieces by anyone who knows jack shit about photo.
Biggest issue: no real subject. you say the mood/contrast is the subject? well there's a huge fucking distraction right in the middle of the frame that pulls the viewer's eye from what is supposedly your subject. and if that was BS and the girl is the subject, then it's a really boring subject: centered, from behind, blurry. I have no reason to want to look at her. IQ is generally not at the top of the list with C&C but this is terrible even by phone standards. you also haven't bothered, but I suspect it didn't even occur to you to straighten the picture. it literally looks like your camera app opened up by accident and snapped a picture you didn't plan and then you decided it had enough artistic merit to post here. my suggestion would really be to read just a little bit about the absolute basics when it comes to composition and post in RPT threads in order to learn how to take pictures.
or you can just ignore that and keep thinking it's art because you say it is.