Ok anon, I'm gonna explain it to you, because you trully doesnt have an idea whats going on.
ISO vs Dynamic range graphs are often straight lines, that have one kink, where ISO rises but dynamic range, not so much. This kink is point where dual native ISO kicks in.
So mathematically, for every point on that line, ASPC + 1stop has better dynamic range than FF. Expect right before kink.
So this fucking idiot accused me of what he has exactly done. Picking ONLY point where relationship doesn't hold, while it holds for every other point on the line.>>3748110
No, I already proven what I had to prove, that comparing f4 vs f2.8 lens is disingenuous. And I tell you what, I don't give a single shit about f1.4 primes, or f2.8 zooms, because I'm not a pro. I am enthusiast, and for me fuji X has everything I'd want to shoot at good, affordable prices, at good quality:
- fast standard primes (fuji 23, 33 f2)
- pancake (fuji 27 f2.8)
- travel zoom (fuji 18-55 f2.8-4)
- ultrawide (samyang 12mm f2)
- telephoto zoom (fuji 55-230 f4.5-6.7)
- portrait lens (viltrox 56 f1.4, viltrox 85 f1.8)
All bases covered, for ~350 USD. ather affordable. And If I ever decided, that fuji 55-230 is not sharp enough for me, or that samyang 12 f2 doesnt have zoom, I can buy EF-S adapter and shoot canon 10-18 ultrawide zoom, or canon 55-250 or whichever lens that I want, because I am enthusiast and I don't give a shit.