Hate to say it but in a fair debate Michael has no chance, especially against someone who has worked at a major corporation and knows how to couch, market and manipulate. Michael goes almost fully on emotion in subjects like this. And while consumers are getting fucked with stuff like the Sentinel and with corps exploiting their willingness to throw away money quickly on KSes and preorders for almost anything due to factors like FOMO, he makes up too much nonsense rather than attacking people like Scott on hard facts.
He instead infers even more nefarious goings on behind the scenes for which there is no hard proof (Scott wanting MOTU to be only online and not at retail for example) and which has counter-evidence (200x dying at retail makes it easy for Scott to counter he would've loved MOTU at retail but the higher ups wouldnt allow it given 200x).
What he should be attacking Scott on is for example the MOTU-Mattel-Dreamworks-Universal situation which many have argued against Scott's claims on.